1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2000 Honda CR-V is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda CR-V weights approximately 205 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda CR-V (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Isuzu Bellel | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Isuzu | Honda |
| Model | Bellel | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |
