1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 319 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 370 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJ (553 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Isuzu Bellel | 2008 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
| Model | Bellel | XJ |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4195 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 553 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 85 L |
