1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2008 Toyota Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1966 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 60 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Matrix (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Isuzu Bellel | 2008 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | Bellel | Matrix |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1794 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |