1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 340 kg more than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Isuzu Bellel | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Bellel | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2498 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |
