1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2009 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Tata Indica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Isuzu Bellel (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Tata Indica. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 295 kg more than 2009 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Isuzu Bellel (159 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Indica. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Isuzu Bellel | 2009 Tata Indica | |
Make | Isuzu | Tata |
Model | Bellel | Indica |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 37 L |