1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Isuzu Bellel | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Bellel | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1301 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |