1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Jaguar 420G is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 608 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar 420G (373 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar 420G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar 420G | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | 420G | 2000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |