1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 1008 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar 420G (373 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar 420G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar 420G | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
| Model | 420G | 102 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2160 mm |
