1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar 420G | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Jaguar | MCC |
| Model | 420G | Smart |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |
