1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 608 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar 420G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 1966 Jaguar 420G has manual transmission. 1966 Jaguar 420G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar 420G | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | 420G | Dingo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2450 mm |