1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar 420G (373 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar 420G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1966 Jaguar 420G has manual transmission. 1966 Jaguar 420G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar 420G | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | 420G | Colorado |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 313 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |