1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar 420G. (255 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar 420G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar 420G. (373 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar 420G.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar 420G | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Jaguar | Holden |
| Model | 420G | UTE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
