1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1975 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1975 Renault Rodeo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 515 kg more than 1975 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1966 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar E-Type | 1975 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | E-Type | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1966 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2410 mm |