1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1975 Volvo 240
To start off, 1975 Volvo 240 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 240 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1966 Jaguar E-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar E-Type | 1975 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | E-Type | 240 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 385 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |