1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1979 Mazda 323
To start off, 1979 Mazda 323 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 370 kg more than 1979 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar E-Type | 1979 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | E-Type | 323 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |