1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1993 Volvo 960
To start off, 1993 Volvo 960 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1993 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1993 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Volvo 960 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1966 Jaguar E-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar E-Type | 1993 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | E-Type | 960 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2780 mm |
