1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP) has 198 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1966 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar E-Type | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | E-Type | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |
