1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (363 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar E-Type. (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar E-Type.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar E-Type | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Hummer |
| Model | E-Type | H3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 363 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2000 mm |
