1966 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar E-Type. (265 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar E-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar E-Type | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Jaguar | Holden |
| Model | E-Type | UTE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
