1966 Jaguar MK II vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 132 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK II | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | MK II | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2680 mm |