1966 Jaguar MK II vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 822 kg more than 1966 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK II | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | MK II | Armada |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 106 L |