1966 Jaguar MK II vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 234 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK II | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | MK II | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |