1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 1992 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1992 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK X | 1992 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK X | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2460 mm |