1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 1992 Peugeot 205
To start off, 1992 Peugeot 205 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1992 Peugeot 205. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1992 Peugeot 205.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Peugeot 205. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK X | 1992 Peugeot 205 | |
Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
Model | MK X | 205 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1904 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |