1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 2000 Renault P55

To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 126 kg more than 2000 Renault P55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault P55. (260 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault P55.

Compare all specifications: