1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 1106 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK X | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | MK X | eK |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2350 mm |