1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Defender is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 162 kg more than 1966 Jaguar MK X.
Because 2005 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Defender. (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Defender.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK X | 2005 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | MK X | Defender |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2498 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 2058 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |