1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jaguar MK X | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Jaguar | Holden |
| Model | MK X | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3781 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
