1966 Jaguar MK X vs. 2012 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar MK X | 2012 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Jaguar | Daewoo |
Model | MK X | Tocsa |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |