1966 Jaguar Type S vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar Type S. (208 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar Type S.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar Type S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar Type S. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar Type S.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar Type S | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Type S | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 264 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 76 L |