1966 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1970 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1970 Subaru FF-1 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Subaru FF-1 (68 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1966 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Subaru FF-1 should accelerate faster than 1966 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1970 Subaru FF-1.
Because 1966 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Subaru FF-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Subaru FF-1. (99 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Subaru FF-1.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jeep CJ5 | 1970 Subaru FF-1 | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ5 | FF-1 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |