1966 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 530 kg more than 1966 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1966 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Sentia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1966 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1966 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jeep CJ5 | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | Sentia |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2860 mm |