1966 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart Coupe (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart Coupe should accelerate faster than 1966 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe. 2005 Smart Coupe has automatic transmission and 1966 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1966 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Smart Coupe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jeep CJ5 | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Jeep | Smart |
| Model | CJ5 | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1820 mm |
