1966 Jensen FF vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (179 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jensen FF weights approximately 375 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jensen FF (588 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (400 Nm @ 1850 RPM). This means 1966 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jensen FF | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Jensen | Cadillac |
| Model | FF | BLS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 279 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 588 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1850 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 108 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2680 mm |
