1966 Jensen FF vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2013 Ford E-Series. (222 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford E-Series. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jensen FF weights approximately 400 kg more than 2013 Ford E-Series. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jensen FF (588 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford E-Series. (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Jensen FF | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Jensen | Ford |
| Model | FF | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 279 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 588 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 108 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3505 mm |
