1966 Jensen Interceptor vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 7,205 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jensen Interceptor (331 HP) has 222 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jensen Interceptor should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1966 Jensen Interceptor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jensen Interceptor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jensen Interceptor | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jensen | Ford |
Model | Interceptor | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7205 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |