1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Fulvia | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2480 mm |