1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1983 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Fulvia | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 65 L |