1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Musso is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 946 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 2000 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 1966 Lancia Fulvia has manual transmission. 1966 Lancia Fulvia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Lancia | SsangYong |
Model | Fulvia | Musso |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 73 L |