1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2002 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lancia Fulvia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lancia Fulvia weights approximately 210 kg more than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2002 Mazda Laputa | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Fulvia | Laputa |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 30 L |
