1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2002 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Cima is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 4,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Cima weights approximately 836 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 2002 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2002 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Lancia | Nissan |
| Model | Fulvia | Cima |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 4498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 934 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1500 mm |
