1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 476 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Fulvia | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 2957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 934 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |