1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (104 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Fulvia | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 316 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |