1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1966 Lancia Fulvia has manual transmission. 1966 Lancia Fulvia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Lancia | Holden |
Model | Fulvia | Colorado |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |