1966 Lancia Fulvia vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (221 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lancia Fulvia | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Fulvia | Megane |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 221 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |