1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1948 Peugeot 202
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1948 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1948 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Peugeot 202 weights approximately 89 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1948 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
Model | Elan | 202 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2460 mm |