1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1950 Peugeot 203
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1950 Peugeot 203. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1950 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 264 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1950 Peugeot 203 | |
Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
Model | Elan | 203 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1556 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 44 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 924 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |