1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Rover P4 (108 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 788 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 1956 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | Elan | P4 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1556 cc | 2636 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1448 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 52 L |
