1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1960 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 265 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1960 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1966 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1556 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2290 mm |