1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lotus Elan weights approximately 190 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Lotus | Lotus |
| Model | Elan | Seven |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1556 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 29 L |
